Recently Communist Party of India (Maoist) and Communist
Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Naxalbari unified in a single party. As
leader of CPI (ML) Naxalbari, comrade Ajith had expressed some views in his
document: against Avakianism. [Naxalbari no. 4, July 2013]. There, he stood
against GUIDING THOUGHT.
We are here refuting the comment of comrade Ajith about
GUIDING THOUGHT.
In his document, he mentioned about our GUIDING THOUGHT
project and three-party statement.
We communists are materialist. Ajith’s view is idealist.
Ajith didn’t understand the motion of matter and its reflections. He doesn’t
understand that a GUIDING THOUGHT guides a revolution.
Ajith says about line, and not thought. Ajith doesn’t
understand the qualitative transformation of line.
He thinks thought and ism as the same. This is not the case.
He simply overlooked the emergence of Thought, its
development to ism. For instance, Mao Thought.
GUIDING THOUGHT is truly collective. A thought is not
individual’s. Individual doesn’t think. Rather thought belongs to a group of
people, class etc. Gonzallo discovers this particular motion of matter as
representative of communists of Peru and whole world who works for revolution.
He is not the only person who thinks in this way, but he is the pioneer.
Siraj Sikder resolved some fundamental questions of
Bangladesh revolution. Therefore we say his GUIDING THOUGHT.
In India, Charu Majumder and Perhaps Kanai Chaterjee also,
resolved some fundamental questions of revolution of India. It’s not merely a
line, but more than that.
Comrade Ajith should understand that an ism doesn’t fall
from the sky suddenly.
Mao Tsetung Thought of 1937, 1949 and 1966 are not the same.
Marxism of Communist Manifesto, Marxism of Capital and post
Paris Commune Marxism are not the same. These are of different levels.
Every revolution gives rise to a GUIDING THOUGHT. Nepal
could have a GUIDING THOUGHT, but revolution was betrayed. Prachanda Path proved
wrong. So, we already requested Napali sincere comrades to discover the
particularity of Nepali revolution, what could be a Guiding Thought for
revolution.
It is charu Majumder GUIDING THOUGHT that founded the
revolutionary movement of India. We know that many Indian comrades believe the
same.
Ajith thinks line is enough for making revolution. So, he
places line against Thought. Thus, he diminishes importance of ideology.
Revolution means transformation of matter and thinking to
qualitatively higher level. GUIDING THOUGHT theory was initiated by Chairman
Mao and discovered and defined by Gonzallo. It is Gonzallo’s one of the most
outstanding contributions. GUIDING THOUGHT doesn’t mean that it is universally
applicable.
GUIDING THOUGHT is related to a particular country. But many
aspects of a particular GUIDING THOUGHT can be universally applicable. For
example, comrade Siraj Sikder said that a semi colony may have a colony. It is
universally applicable. But not all the theories of comrade Siraj Sikder is universally
applicable. In this context, Gonzallo Thought is the most advanced after
chairman Mao, It defined the term Maoism and theory of people’s war. But still
we are not saying that the whole Gonzallo thought is universally applicable. At
the same time, Gonzallo Thought or any other thought can develop itself to Ism.
Already CPMLM France and Workers Organization of Afghanistan
(MLM, PM) have criticized Ajith’s position.
We have noted that Ajith didn’t study the question of
GUIDING THOUGHT.
It is very much necessary to study the question.
There are many Indian comrades who want to study this
question and naturally many resemble our thinking.
We hope CPI Maoist will initiate the study of the most
crucial ideological questions.
Communist Party Marxist-Leninist-Maoist
Bangladesh
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment