As the “democracy” protests
go on in Hong Kong the United States under the Barack Obama regime has
released a statement in support of the demonstrators.
“The United States supports universal suffrage in Hong
Kong in accordance with the Basic Law,” a
statement said, which
was carried in Time magazine. It continued
that Hong Kong residents should have “a genuine choice of candidates
representative of the voters’ will.”……
……“We believe that an open society, with the highest
possible degree of autonomy and governed by the rule of law, is essential for
Hong Kong’s stability and prosperity,” read
the response.
But one big question should be raised—if those values are so
important now in China why were they not respected during the Occupy
movement? Obama and his government seem to like all those values…open
society…a genuine choice of candidates representative of the voter’s will…but
they like it in someone else’s country.
US officials plan to meet with Chinese officials. They may
press for more bourgeois democracy, or they could just give Chinese officials
advice from when they crushed the Occupy movement.
For example—They could explain to Chinese officials how they
had
the mainstream press portray the protesters as dirty, lazy hippie wanna-bees
who just wanted to relive the Woodstock days. They ignored all the complaints
that our politicians are only interested in serving moneyed interests and never
listen to their constituents…or that the economy is leaving people without
homes, medical needs unmet or without jobs. They Ignored the fact that the two-party
system (that’s twice as democratic as a one party system as in China)
prevents any real choices during our elections.
Of the dos and don’ts for successfully beating down
protesters: beat protesters with sticks; shoot tear gas canisters directly at
protesters; arrest and handcuff protesters; mace them in their face once they
are arrested; and just ignore those who shout-“the whole world is watching!”
Yes- the whole world was watching—and US politicians just
didn’t care. Their attitude seemed to be “no one in the world can do ANYTHING
about the way we treat protesters—and no one in the world will do or say
anything. After all—being the world’s greatest supper power means never having
to care what anyone else thinks.
The protesters in Hong Kong probably fall into various factions
from simple reformers to those who actually want to see the entire system taken
down. As far as restoring capitalism goes China’s leaders have already made
huge strides in returning the economic system to capitalism. The government is
mostly communist in name only. The Communist Party of
China uses the concepts of communism mostly as an excuse to curb the
nation’s dissent.
If US leaders really believe in all those lofty democratic principles
and liberties they should lighten up on their own dissidents. They should also
get rid of a two-party system that mostly exists to prevent any real change.
-សតិវ អតុ
Pix from america.aljazeera.com.
2 comments:
What do you think of the debate between Bob Avakian and Cornel West in November?
If I lived close by- I would go to it. Maybe someone will tape it and put it on line somewhere.
I'm not really that familiar with Cornel West. So that would be a new experience to see him in action.
Post a Comment