Lots of folks are posting things about the late great Ernesto "Che" Guevara. Che was not a Maoist. He was not all that found of
But he also had vast differences with the China Soviet Union.
Over all he did more good than bad for world revolution. He was not successful,
but he has inspired generations of would be revolutionaries both in Europe and Latin America. In his many world adventures he was not
successful as a revolutionary but his inspiration is worth noting. Here are a
few items to honor Che. -សតិវ អតុ
Understanding Che Guevara — 42 Years After His Murder
Posted by Mike E on October 13, 2009
Che was executed in cold blood 42 years ago by a
U.S. lead death squad
that captured him in .
Then, as now, he had emerged as a prominent symbol of self-sacrifice,
armed struggle, internationalism and uncompromising opposition to Bolivia domination.
His death stands as a glaring example of the role the U.S. and its
agents play in the brutal repression of humanity’s highest aspirations.
The torturers of the CIA were not invented on 9/11 — but have a very long and
bloody history. U.S.
Che is a highly romantic martyr of the people’s cause. But he was also a revolutionary leader and thinker in a particular complex time; he was associated closely with a specific series of approaches and strategies.
Che (and the Cuban movement he was part of) had a particular line on the role of the people in their own emancipation. It was a view that exalted the actions of small military groupings of “heroic guerrillas” (called focos) in galvanizing revolution. Unlike the Maoists at that same time, Che and Fidel Castro were not advocates of a “land to the tiller” agrarian revolution, but sought to nationalize the existing plantation structure of
and similar countries. Cuba
The fact that so many people revere him is a testimony to the deep desires for liberation throughout the world. And at the same time, revolution is not made by symbolism alone. The controversies surrounding Che’s strategies have contemporary significance.
The following piece was written over ten years ago in appreciation of Che’s impact — while also making a critical assessment of his strategic concepts. There has been considerable excavation of these events since this piece was written. Kasama intends to publish other essays on Che reflecting a number of different assessments.
For more on this click here.