otto's war room banner

otto's war room banner

Friday, December 20, 2013

Phil Robinson—Duck Dynasty—Free speech—I don’t care!


By now most people have heard of Phil Robinson of Duck Dynasty TV fame. Those who watch Fox News (Faux News) we are supposed to believe that millions of Americans are screaming for A&E to rehire him. Conservative and a few libertarians are screaming that this was a violation of free speech.  
Even though I’m giving the story a little space, this is really a non-issue.  A&E a private company and private companies fire people all the time for frivolous reasons. Not more than a year ago, two different women got fired for allegedly disrespecting and criticizing the US military. No one cared about that, in fact a lot of conservative people applauded those companies that did the firing.  Even though these comments were on their personal Facebook sites and even though they made the comments on their own time, the usual argument was “you represent that company even when you don’t work there.” Another argument was “they’re a private company so you can’t really claim they violated your free speech.”
And Robinson’s firing is different how?” Others, as with the “war on Christmas” arguments, claim the firing was an attack on people’s Christian beliefs because some people oppose homosexuality because the Bible is against it.

SO WHAT!

If these conservatives really want freedom of speech they need to be consistent and support it every time it is violated and not just when it is something these conservatives believe in.   -សតិវ អតុ

Fox News Guest Mike Slater: Anti-LGBT Rant Makes Duck Dynasty


Faux News rises up to defend the free speech of nationally known bigots.

1 comment:

samir sardana said...

THE LGBTQ PLAGUES SEVERAL RACES INCLUDING THE WORLD'S LARGEST DEMOCRACY !


HINDOOS HAVE TO ACCEPT THE REALITY THAT RAMA WAS A GAY AND THERE IS NO SIN IN THE SAME

THIS IS A VERSE FROM THE SUDARA KANDAM WHEREIN HANOOMAN IS DESCRIBING THE ANATOMICAL BEAUTY OF RAMA TO SEETA IN LANKA ! dindooohindoo

HANOOMAN IS DESCRIBING "EACH ORGAN" OF RAMA,IN ITS NATURAL STATE IN MICRO DETAIL - WHICH IS POSSIBLE ONLY IF HANOOMAN SAW RAMA NAKED - MANY TIMES !

Y DID HANOOMAN SEE RAMA NAKED SO MANY TIMES ?

WE MUST PLACE IN CONTEXT, THAT 1 MAN FOR 12 YEARS,IN A JUNGLE,EATING ROOTS AND DEAD ANIMALS,WITH NO WOMAN, NO WIFE AND NO SEX - THERE WILL BE COMPULSIONS AND IMPERATIVES !

ALSO WE MUST NOTE THAT WHEN HANOOMAN DESCRIBED RAMA'S INTIMATE BODY PARTS,TO SEETA - SHE SHOWED NO EMOTION OR AROUSAL ! IT IS EVIDENT THAT,BY THEN,SEETA HAD ASSSESSED THE CAPABILITY AND POTENCY OF RAMA

ONE MUST ALSO NOTE THAT NO "NORMAL WOMAN" WOULD HAVE HER HUSBAND'S ANATOMY AND SEXUAL ANATOMY DESCRIBED IN MINUTAE IN PRIVATE,WHEN THE DESCRIPTION IS
"NOT BY A WOMAN" ! IT REFLECTS THE SEXUAL CONDITION OF SEETA AND THE "INTENT OF HANUMAN"

This is Hanooman describing the UNDERSIZED VIRILE MEMBRANE OF RAMA ! (Don’t ask how did Hanooman know)

Book V : Sundara Kanda – Book Of Beauty
Chapter [Sarga] 35
Verse 18.

“He has three folds in the skin of his neck and belly. He is depressed at three places (viz. the middle of his soles, the lines on his soles and the nipples).

He is undersized at four places (viz. the neck, membran virile, the back and the shanks). He is endowed with three spirals in the hair of his head.

IT IS EVIDENT THAT HANOOMAN,RAMA,LAKSHMANA AND SUGREEVA,WERE GAY LOVERS ! ONE MUST ALSO NOTE THAT RAMA HAD BLACK SKIN,AND HAD HANDS UPTO HIS KNEES - AND
WAS THUS NOT SEXUALLY APPEALLING TO SEETA !

Book VI : Yuddha Kanda – Book Of War

Chapter [Sarga] 128

आजानुलम्बिबाहुश्च महास्कन्धः प्रतापवान् |
लक्ष्मणानुचरो रामः पृथिवीमन्वपालयत् || ६-१२८-९७

That Rama, having his long arms reaching down his knees, having a broad chest and glorious, ruled this earth with Lakshmana as his companion.

No humans has arms reaching to the knees ! IT IS EVIDENT THAT THERE CAN BE ONLY 1 REASON,Y RAMA BONDED WITH APES AND MONKEYS ! dindooohindoo

THE TIME HAS COME FOR INDIANS TO FACE REALITY