When I was in high school I imagined that marijuana would be
legalized by the time I was 30. After all, most young people I knew smoked pot
or believed in legalizing it. The age of 30 seemed like centuries ago. But it
came and went and people changed. A lot of them were sucked into the Ronald
Reagan cult of personality and human progress was set back several decades.
Now I’m almost 60 and even though twice as much time has gone
by since high school, I may finally see marijuana legalized. This article is
right…they should have never made that drug illegal. The original reasons for
its ban were racist. Now all across the land the laws are changing. From
Oregon:
- សតិវ អតុ
From The
Oregonian:
Oregon has had a wink-wink, nudge-nudge relationship with
recreational marijuana use since 1998, when legalization for medical purposes
created a wide, open system that distributes pot cards to just about anyone
with a vague medical claim and the signature of a compliant physician. We're
not suggesting that marijuana has no palliative value to those with genuine
medical problems. But let's be honest: Recreational marijuana is all but legal
in Oregon now and has been for years. Measure 91, which deserves Oregonians'
support, would eliminate the charade and give adults freer access to an
intoxicant that should not have been prohibited in the first place.
Opponents of the
measure are
right about a couple of things. Allowing retail sales of recreational
marijuana inevitably will make it easier for kids to get their hands on the
stuff, as will Measure 91's provision allowing Oregonians to grow their own.
It's also true that outright legalization will increase the number of people
driving under the influence, which is particularly problematic given the
absence of a simple and reliable test for intoxication. There is no bong
Breathalyzer.
As real as these consequences are, Oregonians should support
outright legalization. No responsible adult wants kids using pot, but
legalization would simply add another product to an "adults-only"
category that includes tobacco and alcohol. There is no movement to ban alcohol
in order to keep it away from kids, so why use that justification to prevent
the legalization of marijuana, which in many ways is no worse? The potential
increase in intoxicated driving is, again, a reason for concern, and the measure
directs the Oregon Liquor Control Commission to recommend appropriate changes
to the vehicle code by 2017.
For the rest click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment