Marxists get inspired
by a variety of writers and their quotations. There are the main two Marxist
Writers, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, the two basics. Then there is Lenin,
the first successful Marxist revolutionary. After that it can vary from Mao Zedong, Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky (OK to read, not so good for following). There are also a lot of lesser known, such
as Antonio Gramsci and Rosa Luxenburg, who may be a major or minor influence on
Marxist writers and theoreticians. However Pol Pot is rarely sought out for such readings and he left little written work.
While researching and
writing my biography, I Am Pol Pot, I
took interest in a collection of quotes from the Angkar Padévoat, the
faceless, nameless leadership organization that ran Democratic Kampuchea for
nearly three years, until it was replaced by the name, Communist Party of
Kampuchea and for the last two years of the regime an actual personality cult
was formed around Pol Pot.
After their fall from
power, the CPK was dissolved, all references to communism were dropped and the
Khmer Rouge (as they were known to the press) changed their name to the Party
of Democratic Kampuchea.
So the Angkar Padévoat
(revolutionary organization) only existed for about three years. Author Henri
Locard collected The Sayings Of Angkar and listed them in a
book he called Pol Pot’s Little
Red Book. How much was written by Pol is not known. But the
organization’s sayings gave hints as to what the Khmer Rouge thought they were
and what they believed they would become.
Much of my biography
was taken from these sayings. They are used along with other documents and
information to create a full look at Pol Pot and his organization.
The sayings represent
all facets of the group…. the good, the bad, the ugly. Some of these sayings
were very inspirational and represented the group’s grand ideals. Others are
meant to strike fear in those who had reservations about the regime and served
as a fearful warning as to what would happen to those who believed they could defy
the Angkar.
Pol Pot has been
reputed by most Marxists today. That is largely due to the violent and murderous
actions of his regime. Many of his people endured harsh conditions and lost
relatives.
Mao Zedong wrote an
entire essay title “Can Bad ThingsBe Turned Into Good Things?” In it he explains that bad
things happened, but can be turned around into good things in the long run.
I wrote this book with
the idea of studying this regime to see what ideas could have worked and which
could never have. I tried to find interesting aspects of the Kampuchea
Revolution that were worth looking at.
I Am Pol
Pot is available at Barns
and Noble. It can be purchased as an e-book.
It can also be bought as a paperback at
Amazon.
Here is a look at
these sayings:
First there were the
Angkar’s descriptions of itself:
“Long live the
revolutionary Angkar utterly wise and clear-sighted and ever glorious!”
“The Angkar is the
soul of the revolution.”
“Love the Angkar,
Sincerely and loyally”
“The Angkar tenderly
looks after you all, brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers”
“Useless to argue, for
the Angkar’s motives are perfectly pure”
The Angkar was for the
most part, a god-form made by the regime. It is described as a god that knows
and sees all. The good thing about it was that it was not a person. There was
no father figure to worship. It was meant to be a hierarchy with wise leaders
on top and the common people on the bottom. It was very much like a religious
concept. It could be very loving or very vengeful for those who did not
“except” its love.
“The Ankar has (the
many) eyes of the pineapple.” – meaning the people are always watched.
“Secretly observe the
slightest deeds and gestures of everyone around you!”
“Report everything to
the Angkar!”
“The Angkar orders,
execute!”
These sayings imply
that people must spy on each other.
“You see that the
Angkar is gentle;
Be careful not to make
it ferocious!”
“The Angkar is
ferocious only with those who provoke its wrath”
And there was a slogan
that it was better to execute 10 innocent people than letting one guilty go
free. So there were a lot of threats in some of these sayings. Some were
clearly meant to terrorise people.
But they also had
their more inspirational slogans that if truly followed by the party and people
were actually good. Among their best are;
“Be masters of your
own destiny!”
“You have to take a
hand in your own future!”
“Let us live in
equality”
“Embrace the
Proletariat Condition”
“Unity, Equality,
Fraternity, Collectivity, Solidarity”
All of these are good
and inspirational. The following is something that follows the symbolism of
many third world countries, the symbol of the scythe or hoe and a rifle to
represent the work and fight of liberation. Such a symbol appears on
theMozambique flag.
“One hand grasps a
hoe, the other, a rifle” –but
did the Angkar really trust its workers to carry rifles into their paddies and
work. No they didn’t. This was a good slogan, but it was pure idealism.
“Down with American
Imperialists and their lackeys!” –This slogan was used by nearly every liberation movement
of the 1970s.
Some of there slogans
were taken directly from Mao and rewritten to be simplified for the khmers. For
example;
“Dying for the sake of
the people has even more weight than Sacred MountHimalaya; dying for the
capitalists, feudalists, and reactionaries does not weigh more than a goose’s
feather.”
Mao used the name of a
mountain in China. The Angkar used a mountain known to everyone in and out
of Kampuchea.
Some of the slogans
they used as threats can be used by anyone against and enemy and they were good
at insulting their enemies;
“No Gain in keeping,
No loss in weeding out”
It is sad they used
this against their own workers, but it would be a great slogan to use against
the right-wing in the US.
They had other good
insults;
“A king is
unnecessary, for his shit stinks the same as his own people’s.”
And everyone can tell
where this came from;
“Religion is the
opiate (of the people)”
For those who lost
relatives to the Communist Party of Kampuchea, we can’t expect them to just
forgive these people and then use their slogans. However, such slogans can be
studied by those of us who have the time and can find usefulness out of them.
Some of the slogans are cruel and negative in every way. Others can be useful if
separated from the organization that created them. The Angkar included writings
of the leaders and they were almost never signed. Some may have come from lower
party cadre. In any case, the Angkar died when its revolution died. It is like
a person that existed for three years and then disappeared. Its members
dissolved it and replaced it with more reactionary and nationalistic slogans.
These are not the slogans of a hero, but a small part of wisdom from a failed
revolution. The good side is that we know this type of revolution can’t work
and hopefully no one will try it again. As with the Soviet Union we
can learn from its mistakes, but also look for any successes.
No comments:
Post a Comment