Translated to English from Google:
"If they let me, I would tell them
that the main thing in the elections is to boycott them and, if possible, to
prevent them. What will the people gain? Nothing, nothing will win with
the electoral renewal That I think is a very clear thing in the history of the
country " President Gonzalo
Once again the country has entered the electoral campaign in the face of the
presidential elections to be held on 19 February this year.
Once
again our people are forced to attend a purulent electoral process whose
content has become a true mirror that reflects the way the old
bourgeois-landowner democracy operates.
The
struggle between the comparative bourgeoisie and the bureaucratic bourgeoisie
has reached its peak.
The
Alianza País regime once again reissues its alliances with the sectors of
capitulatory syndicalism, indigenous movement and domesticated
peasantry; With certain "revolutionary" parties trained, such as
the opportunist PCE; Socialist, and even with some sectors of the
comprador bourgeoisie that do not see with "bad eyes" the
governmental management of the regime from which it has benefited.
From
the "other side", two fronts. One, the rancid comprador
bourgeoisie represented by the banker Lasso, the most recalcitrant expression
of banking and large landowners. At the same time Cinthya Viteri, from
Madera de Guerrero, another manifestation of the comprador bourgeoisie
intertwined with the great importers, merchants and also with the landowners.
As
a center position to the left, the so - called unity of the
Left, an eclectic coalition that seeks toappear as a "third
way", something like the dustbin of opportunist and revisionist left that
aúpa to "Popular Unity" (extinct MPD) , The ambiguous indigenism of
Pachakutik, some survivors of the Democratic Left, the self-styled "social
movements" and the corporatist residues of the armed forces led by retired
general Paco Moncayo, presidential candidate. This "unity" mired
in abject pragmatism is what President Gonzalo said, " a real
coladera of contradictions as collusion and conflict What unites
them ? The collusion, the pursuits, follow the path of parliamentary
cretinism."
The
inter-bourgeois contradictions exposed in the current campaign have been marked
by the mutual accusations of corruption presented in the management of oil
concessions (Petroecuador), and of course, all the rotting that revolves around
the construction company Oderbech that sprinkles some and others ; The
scamming of accounts of the e-mails of some of the candidates, and the presence
of recycled candidates from the "junk" programs of national
television.
Such
degradation occurs precisely when elections are crucial for reaction to complex
scenarios such as those unfolding in the international arena, where
inter-imperialist contradictions are tempered with bloody violence, forcing a
new repartija and with it a new realignment of The semi-colonies, particularly
within the new plans of the US imperialist superpower and the Russian
imperialist power.
The
importance of these elections is also marked by the interest of the
bureaucratic bourgeoisie to deepen the state reform that has had serious
setbacks in the face of the abrupt fall of the price of oil, without whose
income, reform, has been constrained, Not allowing the temporary reactivation
of bureaucratic capitalism, which by the way falls vertiginously.
The
deep crisis that afflicts the old state and that is exposed in a clear way in
the greater pauperización in the levels of life of our town, is taken advantage
of by the candidates of different laya to vomit its market of electoral offers
vitiated of the most aberrant and insane populism . It is worth mentioning
how much and what each of the presidential candidates offers, all of them,
trafficking with the will of our people, which in one way or another is still
aligned and transits the path that marks the old democracy through elections.
The
old bourgeois-landowner state, today as yesterday, manifested as a true
bureaucratic-military machinery, in recent weeks has shown its high degree of
decomposition, not only at a structural level, but also in the order of its
political and governmental organization . The entrails of the present
fascist regime is spurious, it shows itself as rotten, repressive, defoliation,
demagogue, surrender, it comes from the previous regimes, carrying with it,
besides repression, exploitation and misery, the subsistence of a transversal
axis typical of the semicolonies Semifeudales: corruption.
" Only scoundrels or fools can
believe that the proletariat must first win the majority vote made under the
yoke of the bourgeoisie, under the yoke of wage slavery, and only then should
seize power. This is the height of stupidity or hypocrisy, this is
to replace the class struggle and revolution by voting under the old
regime, under the old power ... " Lenin
Marxism
has contributed scientifically to define clearly what is democracy, who serves
and how it operates in the field of superstructure. But
Marxism-Leninism-Maoism has also been able to delineate what the tasks of the
communists and the consensual element in the bosom of the people with regard to
these bourgeois democratic processes.
Engels
argued that democracy is the logical form of bourgeois
rule ; and Marxism - Leninism coined a definition and clear role
of elections and bourgeois parliamentarianism when it identifies that
"every few years which members of the ruling class to oppress and crush
the people in Parliament: this is the true essence of parliamentarism
bourgeois "aspect that has been fully evident in the
bourgeois-landlord democracy in Ecuador where the people estranged and
alienated either by the relations of production as permanent work that makes
the old state in the field of consciousness, to the Lack of correct ideological
direction, has recurrently moved under the shadow of Pharisee democracy
believing that from the electoral processes can choose their leaders who
perched in the presidency or assembly, will solve their problems and their
requirements.
The
Communists are clear that " parliamentarism has historically
obsolete " is the truth, but we know that we, the masses, yet is
permeable to electoral processes, to that extent it behooves us to
" tell the bitter truth, telling them that their Prejudices, but at
the same time, you should calmly observe the real state of consciousness and
preparation of the whole class (and not only of its communist vanguard), of the
entire working mass only of their advanced individuals) . " (Lenin); We
must spread the role of elections, how they intend to sell us the idea that by
voting we are "sovereign" and "elected" our legitimate
representatives.
It
is up to us to say and demonstrate in fact how this bourgeois democracy is at
the service of the big bourgeoisie, big landowners and imperialism; That
the only democracy that is useful to the masses exploited in countries like
ours: semicolonial and semi-feudal, is the one that is endorsed or constructed
in the New Democracy revolution, which is the structural and organizational
expression of the economy, political, social , Cultural of the new state of
joint dictatorship, worker-peasant-petit bourgeoisie, where the ideological
role of the proletariat is fundamental because it guarantees the transit to
socialism. That outside the state system, a joint dictatorship, there
is nodemocracy that responds to their interests.
The
Communist Manifesto also lays down the conditions which must travel the way for
the liberation of the oppressed masses from oppression and
exploitation: "[Communist] openly declare that their ends can be
attained only by the forcible overthrow the entire social order existing.
" and you have to understand, that old existing social order and
oppressing the masses can never be demolished from the vote, since the amphora,
with soft and evasive measures or reformist governments, that to do so, the
people with proletarian leadership must , Necessarily and inevitably, to wage
its war, which is a people's war, which alone can bury not only the old
democracy, but the old state as a whole, the old power of the big bourgeoisie
and the big landowners, A resounding defeat to Yankee imperialism,
fundamentally.
ELECTIONS
NO !, PEOPLE WAR IS!
This
powerful war cry issued by the Communist Party of Peru summarizes what the
strategic tasks of the proletariat are. To impose, with people's war, the
democratic road before the old road of reaction, the bureaucratic road.
While
it is true that the present levels of organization of the masses and their
vanguard, the proletariat, do not allow us to confront the elections since the
people's war, today we must fight to combat the electoral process as a
substantial component of the great Strategic Construction Plan Simultaneous and
concentric of the three instruments for the revolution: party, front and
popular army.
Promoting
NO VOTE allows us to unmask the class character of the elections. There is
no void or blank vote, because in any case, we vote, and in doing so we endorse
the old instrument of domination with which the reaction counts to keep our
people oppressed, alienated, trapped outside the struggle of Classes and the
people's war, that is, outside the democratic path.
WHAT
TO DO?
NOT
VOTING is an important slogan and action, but it is passive, consequently it
must go hand in hand with actions that explain to the masses why not do it.
NOT
VOTING is important, disdain of the old democracy and its bureaucratic way, but
to that slogan must be made much more combative, which is complemented by
direct action of the masses, therefore also BOICOTEAR ELECTIONS, and, as
President Gonzalo says, if possible, HAVE TO PREVENT THEM.
BOYCOTTING
ELECTIONS TOWARDS THE PREPARATION OF POPULAR WAR IN THE COUNTRY AND THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW DEMOCRACY IN THE SERVICE OF THE GREAT WORLD PROLETARY
REVOLUTION is what we must do.
- Exposing the class character of elections, how they serve to revive the old bourgeois democracy landowner, and that it is incompatible with the requirements of the proletariat and other exploited classes.
- Exposing the revisionist left from the pseudo - revolutionary discourse calls the masses to participate in the elections. Likewise to opportunism, which, riding on trade union, peasant and popular organizations, dragged the masses to the rank of bourgeoisie in the outdated electoral democracy.
- Display a massive campaign by NO VOTE, boycotting the elections. To ignore the constitutionalist dreams of the big bourgeoisie, great landowners and their leaders in the heart of the people: revisionism.
VOTE
NO. BOYCOTT ELECTIONS, a complex but necessary task. Subject to our
short-term capabilities and constraints, we must do it, no matter how far we go
in that task, we must deploy it, execute it, it is our responsibility facing
the class struggle, revolution and the conquest of power.You have to understand
this well, boycotting the elections is also a problem of principles, war, Lenin
argued: " The boycott is a frank declaration of war the old
power, a direct attack on him" that do, declare war To the old landed
bourgeois state boycotting the most relevant symbol of the old democracy: the
elections.
NO
VOTE. BOYCOTT THE ELECTIONS!
DO
NOT VOTE, BOYCOTT THE ELECTIONS, IF POSSIBLE, PREVENT THEM!
DO NOT
VOTE, PREPARE PEOPLE'S WAR!
TO
DEMONSTRATE REVISIONISM AND ITS ELECTORAL OPPORTUNISM!
LONG
LIVE MARXISM-LENINISM-MAOISM!
CONQUER THE RED SUN OF COMMUNISM!
No comments:
Post a Comment