By SJ
Otto
A few days ago I found this article which is called, “How to Be a
Modern Hippie,” by Colleen. I found it
interesting because I was somewhat of a Hippie starting in my high school days
and in my early 20s. In some ways, I still am today. I found this article in
with another Hippie story, “What Are Hippies
Called Today?” Hippies were a big thing in the 1960s. By the 1970s
we were calling ourselves Freaks.[1] We were a little different from the
Hippies, but we were really pretty similar. By the 1970s we had to have out own
identity that differentiated us from the Hippies. We couldn’t just imitate
people from ten years past.
Today, there is no “Freak scene.” The Hippies today are not the same as
those that were visible in
He has long hair. Both of us probably considered ourselves to be Hippies in our
high school days and fallowing. Originally much of that was a cultural thing.
We were counter-culture people along with many of our friends were. We all had
long hair, smoked pot, took LSD at times and we listened to rock and roll of
that time period. Colleen’s article mentioned Led Zeppelin and Jefferson
Airplane. Tom always liked Led Zeppelin and I always liked Jefferson Airplane.
Today, Tom listens mostly to Led Zeppelin. I still like Jefferson Airplane but
I also like punk rock, such as Die Toten Hosen.
Much of what I have written about, so far, has been cultural things such
as music, hair styles and drug use.
My politics have evolved since I was in high school.
As with the Freaks, I was an anarchist, in those days. Today I am a
Marxist-Leninist-Maoist. The ideals of communism are not that much different
from anarchism. Under the final stage of human development, in accordance with
Marxist communist theory, the state withers away.[3] So my beliefs aren’t really all that
different from my high school days. They are different in that I now believe we
need a state, at least for today. But part Colleen’s article is about
compassion toward people and supporting the voiceless, as a part of the Hippie
experience. That is a definite part of my personality and my out look on
politics. My Marxist ideals are simply an extension of my ideas on compassion.
I have compassion for people and I envision a world were there is peace,
equality and people are all taken care of each other—no hunger and no lack of
medicines for those who need it. Politics should lead to happiness.
Colleen writes about Hippies caring about animals. I’ve always liked
animals. I won’t kill an animal, not even an insect, unless it is necessary. I
avoid any practice that causes pain to animals. I try to respect them. I am not
a vegetarian, but I believe in respecting those animals that we eat.
That is different from Marxist. Marxists emphasise the importance of
humans and humans are much more important than animal life. Some Marxists I
have come across are against (sometimes antagonistic to) animal rights and
animal rights activists. I agree that humans are more important. But I disagree
with those who see little or no importance to animal life.
But back to the Hippie article, Colleen discusses the rejection of
traditional mainstream values:
“Their rejection of
mainstream values was surprising because they were the very people who were in
position to gain the most—in jobs,
political access, and
money—from the existing system. That these young people chose to drop out from
lives in which they had clear advantages was a sign to many that perhaps
something really was wrong with the system.
The civil rights
movement was attracting national attention by the mid-1950s, and the New Left
became a factor in American politics in 1962
following the release of
its “Port Huron Statement,” a stirring announcement of youthful
political idealism.”
Again, here is something I have in common with the Hippies. I definitely
feel outside the mainstream. I definitely have little interest in the pursuit
of money and I don’t aspire to be wealthy as I am supposed to, according to the
system and its supporters.
Colleen wrote about some of the theoreticians of the Hippies. Some such
as Timothy Leary and Allen Ginsberg were not that political. Others, such as
Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin were very political. Rubin turned to the right
after the Hippies and Yippies[4] began to die out. Hippies were a
strange movement that included some leftists and some cultural figures who had
no interest in politics at all. Others such as Rubin, ended up as political
conservatives.
I suppose there are some young Hippies around today. For many Hippies,
as my self, we are in our 60s, 70s and older. We are a dying bread. But we are
still Hippies. Some young Marxists I have seen, commenting on line, have said
they see Hippies as being conservative, right-wing, reactionary. I don’t know
how they formed these opinions but I don’t agree at all. In the 60s and 70s we
defied the status quo. We challenged the system on many levels. We challenged
the culture and the politics. We were often met with opposition and it was not
always pleasant or benevolent. Any one who wants to see examples of that
opposition can see the move Easy Rider. The
Hippies were often treated badly and it can be seen in that movie.
Hippies had an impact on our
lives since the 1960s. We have some movements, such as the Revolutionary
Communist Party, that rose directly from the organizations of the 1960s. I’m
glad to have been a part of that experience. The Hippies today are small in
number compared to those of the 1960s and 1970s. Many of those early hippies
cut their hair, put on a suit and got a high paying job. They lost all their
early values. Some of us have retained at least some of those values. I’m proud
to be one of those.
This article is condensed from
the article I originally wrote for Artsy Fartsy. For the entire article click
here.
Here I sit in
a counter-culture bar, Kirby's, with my wife, Cam Gentry.
The above picture ^ is Tom Saad.
[1] Steve Otto, War on Drugs/ War on
People, (Ide House, Los Colinas, 1995),
“The Freaks,” p. 146.
[2] As
this article says, many Hippies are writers, musicians or artists. Tom has been
an artist since his high school days. Here are some examples of his work:
[3] Karl
Marx wrote about states of human development, including primitivism to
Feudalism, from Feudalism to capitalism, Capitalism to Socialism, from
Socialism to Communism. Under the final stage; communism, the state withers
away. Also in the Higher-stage of communism (according to Wikipedia):
To Marx, the higher-stage of communist society is a free association
of producers which has successfully negated all remnants of
capitalism, notably the concepts of states, nationality, sexism, families, alienation, social classes, money, property, commodities, the bourgeoisie, the proletariat, division of labor, cities and countryside, class struggle, religion, ideology, and markets. It is the negation of capitalism.
[4] See
also Steve Otto, Memoirs Of A
Drugged-up, Sex-crazed Yippie, (Authorhouse,
No comments:
Post a Comment