otto's war room banner

otto's war room banner

Sunday, November 10, 2019

India- Charu Mazumdar was one of the greatest leaders to have ever shimmered the light of Communism

By Harsh Thakor
IN BIRTH CENTENARY YEAR AND 50 YEARS OF FORMATION OF THE Communist Party India(Marxist Leninist) (C.P.I.(M.L.) LET US RESURRECT THE IMMORTAL CONTRIBUTION OF COMRADE CHARU MAZUMDAR AS A MARXIST LEADER .HE DEFINED A NEW EPOCH IN THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNIST MOVEMENT BY PIONEERING THE STRUGGLE AGAINST REVISIONISM IN INDIA. AND IGNITING THE SCARED SPARK OF NAXALBARI.HOWEVER WE MUST CRITICALLY JUDGE THE FORMATION OF THE 1969 PARTY WHICH ALTHOUGH MAKING AGREAT HISTORICAL CONTRIBUTION WAS FORMED HASTILY WITHOUT CORRECTLY CONVERGING COMMUNIST TRENDS AROUND IT AND NOT DEMARCATING PROPERLY FROM LEFT ADVENTURISM.

Without doubt Charu Mazumdar was one of the greatest leaders to have ever shimmered the light of Communism who defined a new epoch in the history of India. He was one of the most humble and soft spoken of comrades who addressed folk in very lucid language, with great clarity of thought. In his centenary year we should resurrect his spirit with neo-fascism at its helm and only Marxist-Leninist -Maoist ideology which can extinguish it. Professor Amit Bhatacharya felt that Charu Mazumdar played a much more defining role than any Indian Communist leader, on a pedestal above even Kanhai Chaterjee. Earlier this year on April 22nd we commemorated the 50th anniversary of a landmark event in the history of the Communist Movement which was the formation of the C.P.I.(M.L.).The formation of the party was the culmination of the spark of Naxalbari that was lit in May 1967 as a consequence of the protracted struggle launched against the Kruschevite revisionism 
With the incisiveness of a sculptor Charu Mazumdar chalked out the Indian revolutionary path which sowed the seeds for the revolutionary flame to illuminate the entire country.. Without doubt the C.P.I(M.L.) converted a spark into a Prairie fire from Naxalbari to Srikakulam, Birbhum, Debra-Gopiballavpur, Bhojpur, Mushahari Lakhimpur -Kheri in Terai region as well as regions of Bathinda and Ropar in Punjab and gave a stepping stone to some of the most notable actions and sacrifices. We can recount so many instances of sharecroppers seizing crops in Laxmpur-Kheri and Mushahari and peasants seizing landlord's property and arms as well as punishing goondas.Guerilla units were also formed. to combat the police. Punjab it is significant how the formation of the C.P.I.(M.L.) gave a great impetus to the revolutionary movement with martyrs who shimmered torch of naxalbari like Baba Bhooja Singh in 1972 and Daya Singh and the rise of the famous Bhakra Samoan struggle. Even if they were critical of the left adventurist line it sowed the seeds of the contribution of Comrades like late Shamsher Singh Sheri, Darshan Singh Khatkar late Darshan Singh Dusanj and late Harbhajan Sohi who even if representing different trends were major architects of the Communist revolutionary practice in Punjab.
The party gave a great impetus to the Kila-Hakima struggle where hundreds of armed landless peasants hoisted flags on the farm of a General. It is of historical note that as a result of the self-criticism line of the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) of the C.O.C and the Andhra Pradesh State Committee the C.P.,I.(M.L.) Party Unity group was formed in 1978 and the C.P.I.(M.L.) Peoples War Group was formed in 1980.To these formations that played a major role in the eventual formation of the Communist Part India(Maoist) upholding the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) was an integral part of their political programme and they insisted on its formation. They highlighted the need to build mass organizations and movements reject isolated armed actions of squads and not overestimate era as well as being critical of bureaucratic functioning. Even if making an criticism of the line of '"annihilation of class enemies" they highlighted that Mazumdar himself was making a self -criticism of his line in an article "People's Interest is the party's Interest '.They felt even if not taking an individual terrorist form certain aspects of 'annihilation 'theory could be deployed in specific circumstances and thus did not outright reject it. Without the formation of the original C.P.I.(M.L.) thus major groups like Peoples War Group and Party Unity Group could not be formed. Even the formation of the C.P.I.(M.L.) Central Team had its roots in the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) and formed through self-criticism of the left adventurist line. The successful completion of 1995 party Conference by the C.P.I.(M.L.) Peoples War group has its roots in the 1969 party. Finally it was the precursor of the theory and practice of the C.P.I(Maoist) today in the moral sense with the 1970 Eighth conference party programme upheld by the Maoist party and the Inaugural conference called the 9th Congress. The building of armed agrarian movements in Karimnagar,Warangal,North Telengana ,Dandakarnya by the PWG and in Jehanabad and Koel -Garwah regions by the PU group had a lot to do with the roots of the C.P.I.(M.L.)party ,where mass movements harnessed were inclined towards armed struggles. The building of the Andhra Pradesh Radical Students Union was greatly influenced by Charu Mazumdar C.P.I(M.L)'s call to the students. and so was Revolutionary Writers Association Virasam. It is ecclectic like some sections like C.P.I.(M.L.)Kanu Sanyal ,UCCRI(M.L)-Proletarian line and Communist League of India to term the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) as a terrorist organization or term it as a 'terrorist' party. No doubt there were serious mistakes of left adventurist variety but this was also inherent in the Chinese Communist Party and in other form seven repeated in later decades. Comrades have to uphold the similarities of the C.P.I.(M.L.) with that of the Chinese path but be critical of its serious distortions. It is similar to how groups earlier equated the erstwhile PWG practice with Khalistani terrorists like Chandra Pulla Redy section and how today the C.P.I(M.L) Red Star dubs the C.P.I.(Maoist) as practicing terrorism. The most balanced or correct approach on this has been by the Communist Party Re-organization Centre of India (Marxist-Leninist) with Punjabi Revolutionary journal 'Surkh Leeh"upholding Charu Mazumdar as a great Marxist revolutionary in pioneering rupture from revisionism .It pointed out the serious errors he committed in violating essence of massline but not classing his line and practice as 'terroristic." The C.P.I.(M.L) disintegrated not because of the assassination of Charu Mazumdar as asessed by some but because of errors before 1972 itself. with one section veering towards rightist trend of Satya Narayan Singh and the other heading towards left deviation led by Charu Mazumdar. Suniti Kumar Gosh never openly placed the blame on CM but felt the responsibility lay in the entire party leadership. In his view many ultimately absolved themselves of responsibility for errors by escaping from the field of battle to join mainstream politics. It would be wrong to call Charu Mazumdar the architect of Naxalbari with many leaders organizing the peasant movement at grassroots level like Kanu Sanyal but it was his eight documents that defined the turning point of Naxalbari politics from revisionism like, giving a skeleton to the flesh of a body. Without the line of Charu Mazumdar the struggle would have probably adhered to the revisionist or economist path. It was CM who steered the movement to the correct coarse like giving a ship a proper direction. Charu Mazumdar was the pioneer in India in igniting the spark of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and thus hitting revisionism in the Indian Communist Movement in it’s very backbone and making a fundamental rupture from the revisionist path of the C.P.M. party. Significant it was Charu's political work that secured the release of Kanu Sanyal from prison. There were terroristic aberrations on some of his writings but thrown into oblivion when compared to the progressive essence of his work in the main..His formulation were the equivalent of a wheel to an axle in context of Naxalbari.  However C.P.I.(M.L.) also reflected powerful left sectarian overtones like proclaiming 'China's chairman as Chairman of the Indian party', 'China's path as India's path’, disbanding mass movements and mass organizations, propagating ‘Individual annihilation of class enemy' by secret squads, terming even the national bourgeoisie as comprador, underestimating imperialism by proclaiming revolution would be completed in 1975 and propagating 'Boycott' of elections as a strategic path for Indian revolution. At the time of formation of the All India coordination Committee of Communist revolutionaries itself it expelled comrades Tarimela Nagi Reddy, Devulapalli Venkatestwara Rao and Chandra Pulla Reddy which was erroneous. This was negation to building the agrarian revolutionary line. Significant that comrades later within the central Committee revolted against this line like Sushital Roy Chowdhury, Satya Narayan Singh,or later Kanu Sanyal.It is also or relevance that the Dakshin Desh group did not merge into the C.P.I.(M.L.) disagreeing with method pf party formation which it felt was hasty. in 1969 which went on to turn into the Maoist Communist Centre. The C.P.I.,(M.L) failed to see the convergence of the communist revolutionary trend around the party and resorted to bureaucratic functioning.1970 party programme also had weaknesses in agrarian revolutionary programme and building of mass organizations which were given considerably more respect by the Maoist Communist Centre and the Andhra Pradesh Coordination Committee .We have to historically remember that the All India co-ordination of Communist Revolutionaries of India could not unite all the Indian Communist revolutionaries. Sushital Roy Chowdhary pioneered the criticism of the left adventurist aspects of the C.P.I.(M.L) virtually creating a revolt within the C.C. by making the most objective analysis by all comrades. in an article. He felt that although it initially adhered to path of peoples war it went on to vitiate totally with left adventurist practice. Significant that Zhou En Lai told Souren Bose in 1973 that the general orientation of C.P.I(M.L) was correct, but it's policies wrong. History cannot obliterate the formation of groups like the Unity Centre of Communist Revolutionaries led by T. Nagi Reddy and D.V.Rao in 1976 which rejected the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) or the Chandra Pulla Reddy section which even if morally upheld the C.P.I.(M.L.)was never part of 1969 party. It is ironic today that both sections of the C.P.I.(M.L.)New Democracy which contest parliamentary elections just as Chandra Pulla Reddy supported in his lifetime staunchly defend the formation of the party in 1969 .Probably it was Chandra Pulla Reddy's left adventurist tendency and deviation from NagiReddy-DV. Rao line that made him uphold the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.). Revisionist or rightist trends also erupted from groups having their roots in the 1969 party and upholding formation till today. Groups like C.P.I.(M.L.) Liberation and C.P.I.(M.L.) Red Star are the best example, who have virtually rejected path of protracted peoples war and capitulated to parliamentarism, similar to revisionist left. They are an illustration how left adventurism can take a leap to turn towards right deviation..Kanu Sanyal also who inaugurated it's formation in 1960 too made some valid criticisms of failure of massline before 1970 itself. Infections of Charu Mazumdar line were displayed at junctures even by groups emerging from C.P.I(M.L.) stream making self-criticism like PWG who repeated the individual annihilation of class enemy errors committed by armed squads, particularly in Andhra Pradesh and directly propagated party politics through mass organizations. One has to bear light on the criticism of the left adventurist trend by the PCRC led by Harbhajan Sohi which later became the UCCRI(M.L.) and later the Revolutionary Communist Centre of India(M.L.) formed by Comrade Sheri. Ironic that the group RCCI(Maoist) led by Sheri merged first into the Maoist Communist Centre which originally rejected the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) and not the C.P.I.(M.L.) Peoples War Group. Important that late Comrade HBS even left the C.P.I.(M.L.) and so did Sheri. The merger of the C.P.I.(M.L.) Central Team into 3 groups adhering to the T. Nagi Reddy line in 1994 to form the C.P.R.C.I.(M.L) too shed light on how sectarian it was to insist on recognizing party formation in 1969.. The fact that the unified C.P.I.(Maoist ) insists that in 1969 2 parties were formed-The C.P.I.(M.L.) and the Maoist Communist Centre technically denies the unified party was formed in 1969.To officially uphold the 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) the current Maoist party cannot proclaim itself as the re-organized party as it was the MCC and PWG that merged.)C.P.I.(Maoist) if upholding the legacy of 1969 C.P.I.(M.L.) have to confirm the aberration of MCC being a separate party in 1969.Upholding both parties violates the Leninist concept of vanguard party. Thus if it asesses itself as the unified re-organized party then it is undialectical to uphold that the unified party was formed in 1969. To me even if making the most sizable and qualitative contribution the C.P.I.(Maoist) is a component of the Communist Revolutionary camp of India and does not represent the whole of it .Historically if one insists on the 1969 party as the monolothic centre then arguably one fails to see the crystallization or convergence of the proletarian revolutionary trend in unifications of later years ..Best illustrations are how groups like Maoist Communist Center and Unity Centre of Communist Revolutionaries of India merged with groups from original C.P.I.(M.L.)trend it to form organizations like C.P.I(Maoist) or the C.P.R.C.I.(M.L.) My final verdict is whatever its great qualitative and quantitative contribution the C.P.I(M.L.) was hastily formed in 1969 ,unable to unite very significant sections of Communist revolutionaries and excluding comrades with orientation of massline. The analysis of whether the practice of what was originally the T.Nagi-Reddy-D.V. Rao line by the Communist Party-Re-Organization Centre of India(M.L.) is the correct mass-line will decide the issue.
Chat Conversation End

No comments: