Translated from Spanish to English by Google:
For the Spanish translation click here.
In the 60's of the last century, Khrushchev, in relation to
the nuclear issue and the way he managed with his US
counterpart J. Kennedy, maintained: “We (the US
and the USSR )
are the most powerful countries in the world; if we unite in the name of
peace, there will be no war. So if some crazy person wants war, it will be
enough for us to threaten him with our fingers to make him calm down. ”
"What are
principles for if you lose your mind?" (Pravda, 1963)
It is with these kinds of statements that the Khrushchev's
Soviet revisionism and his clique tried to argue their dire thesis of
"peaceful coexistence" with Yankee imperialism. In other words,
before the so-called threat of a third world war, revisionism considered a
truce with Yankee imperialism and obviously part of that commitment determined
that the USSR renounce proletarian internationalism, to support popular
revolutions and national liberation under the pretext of not to carry out acts
that may eventually provoke the United States. And not only that,
it is appropriate to recall how Khrushchev's revisionism
vehemently attacked Chairman Mao's China for to support the popular
and National Liberation revolutions that were unleashed in Asia, who he said
was an irresponsible act and that endangered world peace.
In other words, the tale of nuclear war by the imperialist
social revisionism of the USSR
turned into vile blackmail for the oppressed peoples of the world to desist
from their revolutionary processes, and in them, from the class struggle.
The blackmail of nuclear war was intended to devour the
class struggle!
Today, imperialism of all kinds: the United States; China,
Russia, Germany, France; etc., their puppets in third world countries, and
in them the revisionists, reissue these Khrushchev's green vomits of
conciliation, of "peaceful coexistence" using the pandemic as a
Trojan horse.
This new version of the nuclear blackmail shown in the
"unit against COVID-19", to some extent tries to put us in the
"same box" of the 60's of the last century, where the
struggle of the communists in the world and its various forms how it manifests
itself in the different countries (people's war; bloody, non-bloody class
struggle) treats or pretends to be subordinated to an apparent main
contradiction that is exposed in the "fight of humanity" against the
pandemic.
Today, the health emergency generated by imperialism itself,
be it Yankee, Chinese or Russian, has even more vehemently exposed how weak
imperialism is in its guts, a true paper tiger; capable of developing
nuclear weapons, traveling off the planet; to attack any
country in any part of the world, however, unable to cope with a crisis within
its borders that, as in the case of the United States, it has
already claimed the lives of more than 80,000 Americans, representing 15% of
the Yankee soldiers who died in World War II; more than the number of
casualties suffered by imperialism in the Vietnam War (53,000); more than
those who died in Korea (33,000); many more of those who happily had to
leave blood on Iraqi land (5,000 casualties); To this, add an unstoppable
rise in the number of infected (approximately one million people) that will
surely double the number of deaths in the coming weeks.
But no, even under these conditions, imperialism bellows
calls for "unity", for "peace" that are replicated in all
the countries subjected by the different manifestations of imperialism in the
world; however, these same powers are still in violent conflict in the
Middle East: Syria, Iraq, Iran; also in Afghanistan; Yemen and
Palestine, increasing the pain of the peoples who are subjected to the most abject
misery and destruction.
Nor do they remain militarily inactive in America . Just
these days they attempted an armed incursion into Venezuela
from Colombia .
Imperialism and its lackeys call us to unity in the same way
as they did in 1963, using the same tactics: “ one of them is the trick in
the style of the priest and the other is repression in the manner of the
executioner. Imperialism's deceptive peace policy and its war policy have
always served and complemented each other. "
In this and any context, is it appropriate to call a truce
in the midst of the development of the people's war in the countries where it
is carried out by the communist parties?
Is it convenient to fall into the hook that governments and
old states throw at the proletariat and other exploited masses with euphemisms
for unity, for a truce of "partisan, ideological or group interests"
in order to attend to the crisis caused by the pandemic?
Not impossible!
Suddenly it is important to remember how in the development
of the people's war in Nepal and particularly before the attack on Dunai,
February 2001, the CPN-M had its Second National Conference held in India,
where the betrayal of the GP, since from that “event” a truce proposed by the
government was accepted. As an act of "good will" the CPN-M
handed over the prisoners of war to the regime and it was from these events and
from that Conference that "tactical" actions calling for a truce, for
negotiations were consolidating. It is not long and the "Prachanda
way" nested in the direction of the Party and took it to the cliff of
history, of capitulation. The people's war was vilely betrayed.
That is to say, it was enough for a moment, a specific
scenario and the revolutionary forces, through their traitors, revisionism and
opportunism, gave the initiative to the enemy. The rest is practically a
matter of time.
There can be no peace, not even circumstantial between the
revolution and the counterrevolution !; between the oppressed countries
and the oppressing countries; between bourgeoisie and proletariat, between
masses and feudalism. The pandemic does not justify handing over the
initiative to the enemy of the class, the people and the nations; You
cannot be allowed to take a breath. The old State is shaking, it is weak,
it is when we must propitiate its fall, this is how the present Mao taught us
in the 6 Military Writings. We must not allow the old Power since its
bankruptcy to try to be generous, "humanitarian"; above all,
have the opportunity to sell the idea that the State does not belong to a
particular class, but to the people, thus recreating,
Definitely, the pandemic rages against the most vulnerable,
with the most miserable, the poor, the outcasts, the landless, those who are
not only oblivious to receiving decent hospital care; those who live daily
and who are now forcibly confined to being locked up without the old states
being able to attend to their most basic daily subsistence requirements.
There can be no peace with the old states and their
governments when they discharge all the responsibility of bearing the social,
health and economic crisis on the shoulders of the workers, as it happens just
now in Ecuador .
There can be no peace with the repressive apparatuses
because they serve the interests of the old state. It is evident in such
elemental things as the violent reaction they have had against our people that
they have been physically, psychologically and even in their dignity attacked
by those miserable guardians of the old Power.
There can be no peace in Colombia when paramilitaries
sustained by the Armed Forces and the old State as a whole continues to murder
peasant leaders in Cauca, Putumayo and other departments. And in this we
must consider that those who put a high death toll are precisely peasant /
indigenous leaders who are at the forefront of the fight for the defense of the
land and who to a large extent are already fed up with armed revisionism and
paramilitary violence / state. But armed revisionism also "takes its
toll", which without going beyond its ideological tirade, typical of the
principles and laws that govern revisionism, led to a peace process that was
fueled by permanent Christmas truces; truces for prisoner swaps; for
new years, for holy week, for floods, “humanitarian” truces and thus, a
series of pauses under any pretext that ended up giving the initiative full
force to the reaction. The sum of small truces became a capitulation that,
as an avalanche that took everything, lives of poor peasants, of combatants, of
demobilized people, which were ultimately used by their leadership so that it
ends where opportunism and revisionism always end. : Congress, the Assembly or
any political dignity of the old State.
There can be no truce in countries where the class, the poor
peasantry and the masses have carried out people's war on the pretext that
these, the masses, are treated healthily, when we know that such attention, if
it comes, will be inappropriate, deficient and Obviously it will be instrumental
zed to undermine the base of support that the people's war has within the poor
peasantry.
The latest experience of the Philippine comrades in relation
to the unilateral truce decreed between April of this year says it all. The
enemy, taking advantage of the truce due to the pandemic, mounted 36 attacks on
the NPA in which 18 comrades died and 8 wounded. Although it is true that
the timely reaction of the people's army caused 56 casualties to the enemy, in
itself the facts show that imperialism and the old states always, always attend
truces, agreements, basically with the intention of destroying the revolution.
, either from the annihilation of the living forces, such as stripping them of
support bases or influencing their political and ideological line to drag them into
political annihilation.
Lenin well pointed out about the attitude that we
revolutionaries should have in the case of pandemics and the impossibility of
renouncing the fight against the enemy of the class, since it is obvious that
behind this world crisis it has been generated precisely by them, by the
enemies of the class and the people.
We must do precisely what Chairman Mao did in 1963 when
Khrushchev intended to blackmail third world countries with the spiel of
nuclear weapons and the third world war; unmask them, combat them; Denounce
their fallacy, their lie, their strategy. Combat-resist and persist in the
class struggle, in the people's war, but also in the two-line struggle within
the people; not attending, not understanding this situation will lead us
to live defeats for the international proletariat.
The people's war has made important leaps in Turkey , the Philippines ,
India and Peru . Falling
into the blackmail of COVID-19 will leave open fissures that will surely make
the people's war vulnerable, because what is gained will be easily delivered to
the enemy and yes, contrary to what the publication by Pravda supporting the
Khrushchev thesis in 1963 said. , the principles count so let us lose our heads
because this has been the case throughout history, because this is how they
“lost their heads” in the commune of Paris, in the revolution in Russia, in
China, in the same popular wars that are taking place in the world those
communists convicted of its principles and who have shown us the correct route
to follow if indeed the Revolution of New Democracy, Socialism and communism is
on our program.
We cannot and should not propose truces since the people's
war, or the class struggle for an elementary fact: we still do not have power
in our hands, and that, in truth, is the biggest and most solid argument.
Today there is no wind that comes from the East to prevail
over the West; today there is an unstoppable whirlwind emerging from the
very bowels of third world countries and that there will be no nuclear war,
military aggression, reaction, pandemic or any social or natural phenomenon that
can stop it.
Not to truces; not to covenants; no to the talks
yes to the people's war up to communism.
No to the teguas because the imperialist oppression of the
semi-colonies does not stop, it does not stop for a single minute; because
capitalism is predatory, inflexible and exploitative with the workers; because
the great landowners second by second, minute by minute, bleed the poor
peasantry; because revisionism and opportunism do not waste a single
moment to sink their poisonous darts to dismantle the revolutionary scope of
the proletariat and its strategic allies.
No to the truce in the class struggle in the countries where
war is carried out without bloodshed; no to class reconciliation; yes to
the open, determined confrontation, that which, even from the protest struggle,
contributes to the prompt and urgent development of the people's war.
No to passive fighting; no to dialogue; if to the
active, revolutionary struggle, otherwise, we will not be what we are.
LONG LIVE THE PEOPLE'S WAR IN PERU ,
THE PHILIPPINES , TURKEY AND INDIA !
NO TO TRUCK WITH THE ENEMY OF THE CLASS, THE POOR PEASANT
AND THE PEOPLE!
NO TO CLASS CONCILIATION IS A PRETEXT TO FIGHT THE COVID-19
PANDEMIC!
IF WE DO NOT FIGHT REVISIONISM, WE WILL HAVE NOTHING DONE!
TO CONQUER THE RED SUN OF LIBERATION: COMMUNISM!
No comments:
Post a Comment