otto's war room banner

otto's war room banner

Monday, May 24, 2010

Young Americans don’t hate Socialism

The Tea Baggers may “take their government back,” but they better enjoy it while they can. Polls show that younger people don’t hate socialism the way the older Tea Baggers do. As the older generation grows older and dies off, the younger ones will take their place and probably change what they have held so sacred to themselves, such as capitalism.

According to The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press:

Young people are more positive about “socialism” – and more negative about “capitalism” – than are older Americans. Among those younger than 30, identical percentages react positively to “socialism” and “capitalism” (43% each), while about half react negatively to each. Among older age groups, majorities view “socialism” negatively and “capitalism” positively.
People 65 and older have a particularly negative reaction to “socialism” – 73% have a negative impression of the term compared with just 14% who are positive. But those 65 and older are no more likely than those ages 30 to 64 to have a positive reaction to “capitalism” (56% vs. 55%).

Also from The Kasama Project:

Capitalism: Big Surprises in Recent Polls

by Charles Derber
According to the conventional wisdom, the US is a center-Right country. But a new poll by Pew casts doubt on that idea. It shows widespread skepticism about capitalism and hints that support for socialist alternatives is emerging as a majoritarian force in America’s new generation.Carried out in late April and published May 4, 2010, the Pew poll, arguably by the most respected polling company in the country, asked over 1500 randomly selected Americans to describe their reactions to terms such as “capitalism,” “socialism,” “progressive,” “libertarian” and “militia.” The most striking findings concern “capitalism” and “socialism.” We cannot be sure what people mean by these terms, so the results have to be interpreted cautiously and in the context of more specific attitudes on concrete issues, as discussed later.

Read the rest of this entry »

No comments: