Translated from Spanish to English with Google;
"Fighting is to
survive, to make peace is to perish" is the conclusion of the supporters
of the resistance; "Make peace is to survive fight is to perish" is
the conclusion of supporters of peace. "[1]
Chairman Mao Tse-tung
The fact that the FARC
has signed a peace treaty with the Colombian government does not draw
attention. While it is true he has been fighting about for 50 years, half of
these has been proposed "ceasefire" "ceasefire",
"create dialogue tables", "build peace", "bilateral
ceasefire "" unilateral ceasefire "etc., etc.
In 1982, under the
regime of Belisario Betancourt, the FARC and the state managed to define
mechanisms that approached a series of talks for "peace", giving
openness to a political practice that disconcerted not only their partners (the
old State Colombia) guerrillas but the rest of Latin
America .
Betancourt in 1984
achieved the demobilization of some combatants of the FARC and these give way
to the formation of the Patriotic Union (UP), a strategy that argued the
creation of "legal front" constitutionalist; a dangerous political
duality that ended the lives of the majority of its members.
With Gaviria was no
different and with Pastrana alone (1998). In fact, here the FARC achieve the
rule deliver them an important area in Caqueta [2], all to create the
environment to allow converge on the so-called "peace." Obviously,
progress was made on the issue but failed to materialize. And so to this day
where the "Chronicle of a Death Foretold" was subject to a certain
death and in fact apparently already took shape and found his niche within the
space of political mobility of bourgeois democracy.
We might consider that
the origins of the FARC in Marquetalia reflected an objective effort to hold a
fair peasant war, expressing the deep contradictions between large landowners
and landless peasants. The feudal and semi-feudal relations of production
pervivían then lined the way to go.
While this was a
bourgeois democratic exercise, it is clear that the absence of a correct
address class made the process gradually take different paths to nest in the
small bourgeois reformism and he mimics the pseudo-Marxist discourse.
Possibly the
ideological mutation FARC becomes dramatic when they decide to align with one
of the most protervas expressions of revisionism: Khrushchev and other satraps
of the imperialist social reaction. It is important to say that did not lose
the perspective of Guevarism, hence the spirit of wandering and suicidal
underestimation of the role of the masses in the revolutionary war.
The "Bolivarian
revolution" was, in terms ideological which has strengthened this
revisionist catalyst to get them to the tail of the big bourgeoisie, the big
landowners, pandering to imperialism with its Latin American strategy of
"demobilization of armed movements" and of course, the Castro
revisionism not yield in its efforts to remain the midwife of disenchantment.
The important military
structure of this guerrilla and no less talkative firepower has puzzled many
revolutionaries in the world. The radicality in the method has been useful to
disguise the ideological rickets. That is, radicals with ideology-weak weapons.
reformist-revolutionary strength squalor.
Away are the FARC have
been a revolutionary guerrilla. His reformism has been exposed permanently.
Perhaps the latest statements from his commander, Timoleon Jimenez (Timoshenko)
have the ability to simplify their political and ideological essence:
"... This
is not a process that is aimed against entrepreneurship. This is not a process
that is aimed to overthrow the Colombian government, is a process that is
trying to create the conditions for transformations occurring in Colombia to let
us kill ideas that everyone defends "
"... What we want
is a Colombia
to develop. The productive forces develop. We need to rescue the domestic
industry, we rescue the riches ... "
As they say lawyers,
"a confession of a party relay tests." It is obvious that this speech
is not new, is not a product of the FARC living situation, or at least its
spurious command, this has been the political sense that has been dragging for
decades. Nor against employers, nor against the state. "To develop the
productive forces", how interesting, Nomás they forget that within these
productive forces there are relations of production and that these relations
generate irreconcilable antagonisms and that they can only be solved with
revolutionary violence, or we will have to ask the big bourgeoisie, the big
landowners and imperialism if they are willing to put aside their interests
without a fight bloody resistance (?).
Already in
practice things they were not displayed different. Successful enough that
analysis that make the comrades of the UOC (Workers Union of Colombia) that the
FARC ended disputing landowners, state, paramilitary (etc.) the extraordinary
ground rent, beating out two big losers: the poor and the wage laborer
peasantry. In fact anti reformism became popular, and certainly anti
proletarian.
You can not ignore
those great military campaigns waged by the FARC that did not aim to destroy
and build, to generate power at all, basically those fights only pointed to
become true mechanisms of pressure to induce the distinction successive
governments attend famous affable negotiating table in the interests of the
command conditions.
But you have to see
exactly what is behind the "pacification" of the FARC. In this regard
we have no doubt it is to mimic the defeat of the armed revisionism in Colombia in an
apparent "stagnation of war" [3]. That's the point, without
underestimating the fact that the armed movements of this order, for now, are
not functional to imperialism nor the reaction using them as a pretext to
unleash the most ruthless repression against the just popular rebellion him,
and Ideological and organizationally this DISARM THE class and the masses.
The demobilization of
the FARC rises from the speech of the false bourgeois peace which contrasts
totally and antagonistically with the just and legitimate desire to have the
masses of peace, but not one that stated Obama, Raul and Fidel Castro, Santos,
his general and the FARC [4], but the peace is won by eliminating production
relations that generate exploitation, shame, misery, hunger, pain. The masses,
and in them most particularly the proletariat, claim the peace that involves
multilateral termination of this comprehensive violence, multifaceted, which generates
a country subjected by imperialism and incompatible productive regime with
historical requirements of workers and other masses exploited.
We must highlight an
important issue. Not that the proletariat and peoples of the world because we
acongojemos demobilize the FARC or regret they do and why they shout
capitulators !, traitors !, as I do (from a unilateral position) would assume
your control program , forms of organization, combat and especially its base or
ideological foundation was right, or even more, the masses are to be
"orphan" of revolutionary leadership, NO !, WHATSOEVER !; anyway to
those who have betrayed it has been his own comrades and obviously the people
of Colombia that the story of this revolution (Bolivarian) swallowed and
generously gave their blood at the end of account has been trafficked to
strengthen the bourgeois thesis the false universality of the state
conceptions, peace, democracy, freedom, and of course, the political greed of
their commanders with dog dreams look like Congress or sitting on the other
bureaucratic apparatus of the old state.
We do not doubt that
at the base and middle management sectors FARC has truly committed to his
people. But that commitment will lose totally sense if it is not run by the
correct ideological line (proletarian), but has the support of a correct
Communist Party, on a platform of consistent struggle with the Colombian
reality and of course, on the basis of the People's War. Persist in what has
hitherto been the FARC will be as enliven a political corpse after a few steps
and fall back reissue new agreement will soon be presented.
FARC AND ECUADOR
The impact of the
capitulation of the FARC in Ecuador
has a lot of weight, perhaps more than in other countries.
Ecuadorian
revolutionaries have been bound to be a logistical tool for the Colombian
guerrillas, its strategic rear.
The message that sends
the FARC and all his acolytes in the country is the peace, the
bourgeois-landlord peace, peace of disarmament but that leaves absolutely open
all the wounds can not be healed by the electoral, bureaucratic privileges,
constitutional.
The country already
left the revisionists to cast their vaunted arguments intended to justify what
happened in Colombia, but beyond that, to confuse the masses and the class on
their fundamental tasks facing organize and prepare the People's War as and
valid only mechanism for the destruction of the old state and the construction
of new power track.
The PCMLE: "The
armed struggle as a way to seize power has not failed; political and social
circumstances force prioritize other forms of struggle of the masses to allow
greater and more rapid accumulation of forces to seize power. "
The Ecuadorian
Communist Party: "We welcome the successful peace processes in Colombia . This
ceasefire is the beginning of a change in Colombian sister country. "
The Ecuadorian
Socialist Party: "One Colombia
without armed conflict will be a great opportunity for democratic consolidation
and crystallization of the enormous economic potential of the country (...)
Peace is an old and deep longing of Colombian society, its realization requires
the expectant society abandon its stance and actively participate in its
construction. "
And under that same
tenor other sectors of revisionism and opportunism release their vomiting that
spread the apparent benefits of the "democratic participation,
peace," Farewell to Arms ".
The message that sends
the demobilization of the FARC through its Ecuadorian spokesmen is the
impracticality of revolutionary violence, to the end, for them, 50 years of war
has not stopped but only destruction and victims, reducing the problem of war
tara and his ideological war strategy outdated and inconsistent with the
reality of our peoples.
The message of the
demobilization of the FARC collecting the regime of fascist Correa is that not
everyone will surrender their weapons and must be standing alert the armed
forces to neutralize the series of criminal gangs that are to be formed and
"come to the country to commit crimes". That's what you think the
correísta regime fighters of the FARC, who are "potential criminals".
And under the repressive apparatus that argument continue gulping the national
budget and give free rein to their repressive voracity with those who we do not
agree with that "peace".
About related to the
FARC, fascist Correa, a few weeks ago purposes, he announced the country that
the government would become an interlocutor between the paramilitary regime Santos and Che Guevara ELN guerrillas to overtake
demobilization talks in Ecuador .
The knowledge of the
ELN, the knowledge of the narco-paramilitary government of Santos, the
knowledge of the fascist Correa, our people and their vanguard class, the
proletariat, rejects the presence of delegates of the old state of Colombia and
ELN members in national territory using it as a base of imperialism to deploy
its strategy of disarmament of peoples and delegitimize the use of arms as a
legitimate right of the exploited.
DEMOBILISATION AND
FACILITATORS
The role that has
fulfilled the putrid Cuban leadership throughout this process has been crucial.
For several years
Fidel Castro has been dedicated to delegitimize the use of violence to seize
power. Not only that, the qualifies of extemporaneous and not infrequently
aroused the FARC to lay down their arms. No different Raul Castro, who
apparently took on the task of tending the demobilization of armed opposition
groups as an imperialist mandate and seeks to demarcate the distances between
revolutionary violence and the transformation of society, of course, behind
this is to be complacent and benevolent with US foreign policy.
As our people say,
"incendiaries firefighters." This is essential in the analysis, it
must be assessed in its proper dimension the role that it has met the Cuban
revisionism in the demobilization of armed processes in Latin America, and it
must be said, even from the revisionism have done so well that no we doubt
Obama and imperialism must be so happy, as much as Santos, Timoshenko, and the
entire reaction the planet. In other words, what has not been able or wanted to
do the bourgeois army of Colombia Castro has done since its oracle of
revisionism.
The Fariano speech
manifests unique, different, and even "guarantor of peace". But worth
asking, does the number of political-military organizations, parties, armed
movements and demobilized in Colombia
not hawking the same?
The PLA (hoxista), the
Revolutionary Workers Party (PRT), the Quintin Lame Armed Movement, the ADO
(Self-Defense Obrera), the Ricardo Franco, the M19, the FARC and the ELN that
sooner or later it will because that is the nature of the petty bourgeoisie.
All these
organizations ended up taking the idea that under the umbrella of bourgeois
democracy could do politics and conquer the once objectives set out with
weapons. Too bad they realized too late because by left the vital efforts of
courageous sons of the people who believed in the revolutionary slogans of the
guerrilla commanders who knew that the corollary to their wars ended in the gallows
of the old democracy and in it, the bureaucratic way.
ALL IS LOST?
It would seem that
with the demobilization of the FARC the path of armed struggle in Latin America closes. At least that is what they will
disclose to the four winds imperialism, Castro and the reaction from another
perspective the Movadef entrenched in Peru .
But hyenas are dreams,
dreams of reformism, dreams of imperialism.
Violence is not the
heritage of the old state, much less of revisionism. The People's War, that if
heritage of the proletariat, and must be understood well. Today the FARC to
throw ravine is not a problem, the problem is in what to do? And you have to
start there. Lenin simplified it masterfully, the subject of the instrument,
the Party. Build and ideologically strengthen a communist party that meets the
historical tasks of the proletariat to address specific objectives as have the
instruments to the revolution, to organize the People's War within the village,
untie unceremoniously against the enemies of the class and the people; destroy
the old state and replace it with the new, the new power.
And on that task the
proletariat of Colombia has
advanced enough, there is only forge, persist, build, persist; the People's War
will do the rest, we doubt not the case in Colombia ,
in Ecuador , in Latin America , in the world.
NO TO THE
FAKE PEACE OF IMPERIALISM, OLD STATE OF COLOMBIA and revisionism FARC.
YES TO PEACE
PEOPLE TO CONQUER WITH the speargun.
Once again
ENDORSES THE THESIS THE CHAIRMAN MAO: revisionism is the main danger of
revolution.
LONG LIVE
THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE GREAT CULTURAL REVOLUTION, HISTORICAL LEGACY THAT
IF THAT TEACHES not fight revisionism, NADA have done.
LONG LIVE
THE STRUGGLE OF THE PROLETARIAT AND PEOPLE OF COLOMBIA !
LONG LIVE
MARXISM-Leninism-Maoism!
[3] [3]La tesis del
llamado “estancamiento de la guerra” ya fue expuesta por el revisionismo armado
en El Salvador , en los años
80´ del siglo
pasado. Bajo esta figura se patrocina la idea del “diálogo”, la “paz”. Un burdo
argumento en el que de la noche a la mañana la guerrilla se da cuenta de que no
puede derrotar las fuerzas vivas del
enemigo, pero eso sí, que éstas tampoco pueden derrotar a la insurgencia.
Pierden la perspectiva de la guerra y caen en la estrategia del enemigo que
propugna precisamente eso, seducir a los comandantes para que puedan acceder al
Congreso o Asamblea, y obvio, éstos arrastran a sus combatientes a la ilusión
democrático-burguesa.
[4] Curiosamente Obama, Raúl
Castro, Santos y las FARC coinciden en los propósitos, argumentos y viabilidad
de la paz bajo una premisa fundamental: la legitimación de la democracia como
instrumento político que permite el acceso a las distintas corrientes
ideológicas sin que su geometría se vea alterada en absoluto. Las FARC se da
modos, de un plumazo (por lo menos lo intenta mientras el discurso le sea
funcional a su viejo reformismo), de mandar al carajo las tesis marxistas sobre
el carácter de clase que tiene la democracia, el estado, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment